Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure PlatformCrédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform
VS
NagarroNagarro
Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform

Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform

83, Boulevard des Chênes, Guyancourt, Île-de-France, 78280, FR

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
759/1000Fair

Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform a pour vocation de devenir un pôle technologique de 1er plan, attractif pour les collaborateurs, les nouveaux talents et les partenaires IT. Nos ambitions : développer de nouvelles plateformes adaptées aux pratiques du dig...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:1,676
Subsidiaries:48
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Nagarro

Nagarro

Munich, DE

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.nagarro.com
752/1000Fair

Nagarro helps future-proof your business through a forward-thinking, fluidic, and CARING mindset. We excel at digital engineering and help our clients become human-centric, digital-first organizations, augmenting their ability to be responsive, efficient, intimate, crea...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:21,481
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform

Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nagarro

Nagarro

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nagarro in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nagarro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nagarro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform

Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Nagarro

Nagarro

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform company and Nagarro company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform company and Nagarro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform company and Nagarro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform company and Nagarro company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform company and Nagarro company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform company and Nagarro company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform company and Nagarro company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform company and Nagarro company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform company and Nagarro company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform company and Nagarro company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform company and Nagarro company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform and Nagarro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform and Nagarro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform or Nagarro ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform or Nagarro ?
Between Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform and Nagarro, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Crédit Agricole Group Infrastructure Platform and Nagarro, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1