Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CrayolaCrayola
VS
Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.
Crayola

Crayola

1100 CHURCH LANE, EASTON, PA, 18044, US

Last Update: 09/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.crayola.com
769/1000Fair

Crayola has inspired children to express their creativity since 1903. Each day Crayolians take pride in fulfilling our mission of helping parents and educators raise creatively alive children around the world. Join our team and be part of an iconic brand that develops ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:1,576
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., Mumbai, 400079, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
790/1000Fair

Godrej is one of India’s most trusted brands serving over 1.1bn customers worldwide, every day. Godrej & Boyce, a Godrej group company, began it's journey in 1897 with the manufacture of high quality locks and continues with its outstanding engineering capabilities ac...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:19,182
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Crayola

Crayola

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crayola in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Crayola (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crayola cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Crayola

Crayola

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Crayola company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Crayola company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Crayola company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Crayola company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Crayola company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Crayola company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Crayola company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Crayola company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Crayola company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Crayola company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Crayola company and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Crayola and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Crayola and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Crayola or Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Crayola or Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. ?
Between Crayola and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Crayola and Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA