Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CrayolaCrayola
VS
Electrolux GroupElectrolux Group
Crayola

Crayola

1100 CHURCH LANE, EASTON, PA, 18044, US

Last Update: 09/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.crayola.com
769/1000Fair

Crayola has inspired children to express their creativity since 1903. Each day Crayolians take pride in fulfilling our mission of helping parents and educators raise creatively alive children around the world. Join our team and be part of an iconic brand that develops ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:1,576
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Electrolux Group

Electrolux Group

Electrolux - Stockholm, Stockholm, SE, SE-10545

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.electroluxgroup.com
805/1000Good

Electrolux Group is a leading global appliance company that has shaped living for the better for more than 100 years. We reinvent taste, care and wellbeing experiences for millions of people, always striving to be at the forefront of sustainability in society through ou...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:30,968
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Crayola

Crayola

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Electrolux Group

Electrolux Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crayola in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Electrolux Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Crayola (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crayola cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Electrolux Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Electrolux Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Crayola

Crayola

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Electrolux Group

Electrolux Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Crayola company and Electrolux Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Crayola company and Electrolux Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Crayola company and Electrolux Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Crayola company and Electrolux Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Crayola company and Electrolux Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Crayola company and Electrolux Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Crayola company and Electrolux Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Crayola company and Electrolux Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Crayola company and Electrolux Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Crayola company and Electrolux Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Crayola company and Electrolux Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Crayola and Electrolux Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Crayola and Electrolux Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Crayola or Electrolux Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Crayola or Electrolux Group ?
Between Crayola and Electrolux Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Crayola and Electrolux Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES