CSML A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
CSML
Company Information
Website:http://www.cravath.com
Employees number:1,517
Number of followers:54,951
NAICS:54111
Industry Type:Law Practice
Homepage:cravath.com
CSML Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 650 and 699
CSMLLaw Practice
Updated:
30/06/2026
30/06/2026
687/1000
Weak
B
CSML Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
CSMLLaw Practice
Score locked

CSMLWeak
Current Score
687B (WEAK)
01000
1 incidents
0 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
687
JUNE 2026
687
MAY 2026
685
APRIL 2026
684
MARCH 2026
682
FEBRUARY 2026
680
JANUARY 2026
679
DECEMBER 2025
677
NOVEMBER 2025
676
OCTOBER 2025
674
SEPTEMBER 2025
672
AUGUST 2025
670
JULY 2022
759
Breach
22 Jul 2022 • CSML
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, Proskauer Rose, Cravath Swaine & Moore, Mossack Fonseca and Weil Gotshal & Manges: Biggest Legal Industry Cyber Attacks
Law Firms Under Siege: A Rising Tide of Cyber Attacks Targets the Legal Industry
574
CRITICAL-185
ORRWEICRAMOSPRO1782779207
Law Firms Under Siege: A Rising Tide of Cyber Attacks Targets the Legal Industry
The legal sector is facing an escalating cybersecurity crisis, with law firms increasingly targeted by sophisticated threat actors. A recent survey by Arctic Wolf and Above the Law revealed that 39% of law firms experienced a security breach in the past year, with 56% of those incidents resulting in the loss of confidential client data a devastating outcome for an industry built on trust and discretion.
### Why Law Firms Are Prime Targets
Several factors make law firms particularly vulnerable:
- Digital transformation: Firms rely heavily on cloud-based applications and web platforms, expanding their attack surface.
- Valuable data: They store vast amounts of sensitive client information, including financial records, PII, and privileged legal documents.
- Lack of preparedness: Only 26% of firms consider themselves "very prepared" to respond to cyber incidents.
- Resource constraints: Many lack dedicated cybersecurity personnel or struggle to meet evolving compliance standards.
- Sophisticated threats: The average ransom demand for legal organizations reached $1 million in 2023, with attackers exploiting weak incident response (IR) plans and third-party vulnerabilities.
### Notable Cyber Attacks on Law Firms
#### 1. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (2023)
- Attack type: Data exfiltration (details undisclosed)
- Impact: Compromised PII and health data of 637,000 breach victims, leading to multiple class-action lawsuits.
- Target: The firm specializes in data breach litigation, making its own client records a high-value target.
#### 2. Grubman Shire Meiselas & Sacks (2020)
- Attack type: Ransomware (REvil group)
- Demand: Initially $21 million, later doubled to $42 million after hackers leaked Lady Gaga’s legal documents.
- Outcome: The firm denied paying the ransom, though reports suggest a partial payment of $365,000 was made.
#### 3. Proskauer Rose (2023)
- Attack type: Data breach via unsecured Microsoft Azure cloud server
- Impact: 184,000+ files exposed for six months, including financial deals, NDAs, and acquisition documents.
- Response: The firm secured the server and launched an investigation with cybersecurity experts.
#### 4. HWL Ebsworth (2023)
- Attack type: Ransomware (ALPHV/Blackcat)
- Impact: 4TB of data (2.2 million files) stolen, including employee IDs, financial reports, and client documentation.
- Aftermath: Hackers leaked 1.45TB of data on the dark web; an Australian court issued an injunction to block access.
#### 5. DLA Piper (2017)
- Attack type: NotPetya ransomware (originating in Ukraine)
- Impact: Global disruption employees lost access to email, phones, and documents. The firm spent 15,000 hours in overtime rebuilding its Windows environment.
- Attribution: Linked to Russian state-backed actors.
#### 6. Mossack Fonseca (2016)
- Attack type: Alleged hack (or insider leak)
- Impact: 11.5 million documents (Panama Papers) exposed, revealing tax evasion schemes and shell companies.
- Aftermath: Governments recovered $1.2 billion in unpaid taxes; the firm shut down in 2018 amid reputational damage.
#### 7. Cravath Swaine & Moore / Weil Gotshal & Manges (2016)
- Attack type: Insider trading via malware
- Perpetrators: Three Chinese nationals stole confidential M&A data, earning $4 million in illicit profits.
- Penalty: The SEC fined them $8.8 million.
### The Broader Impact
Cyber attacks on law firms extend beyond financial losses. Breaches erode client trust, disrupt operations (e.g., frozen billing systems), and trigger regulatory scrutiny. Many firms remain silent about incidents due to lack of mandatory disclosure laws, leaving the full scope of the problem unknown.
As threat actors refine their tactics from ransomware to phishing and insider threats the legal industry must confront its cybersecurity gaps or risk becoming a persistent target.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for CSML ??
What was CSML's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was CSML's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was CSML's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was CSML's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was CSML's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was CSML's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was CSML's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was CSML's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was CSML's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was CSML's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What was CSML's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on CSML's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with CSML ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view CSML's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?