Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Craneware GroupThe Craneware Group
VS
Hapvida NotreDame IntermédicaHapvida NotreDame Intermédica
The Craneware Group

The Craneware Group

600 W Hillsboro Blvd, Deerfield Beach, 33441, US

Last Update: 20/07/2026

View Profile
702/1000Moderate

For over 25 years, The Craneware Group has led healthcare financial and operational transformation with innovative technologies that drive measurable results. Our Trisus® cloud ecosystem integrates data, value cycle intelligence, and advanced analytics, helping healthca...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:779
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Av. Paulista 867, São Paulo, SP, BR, 01311-100

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.hapvida.com.br/
809/1000Good

Com 80 anos de experiência, a Hapvida é hoje a maior empresa de saúde integrada da América Latina. A companhia, que possui mais de 73 mil colaboradores, atende 16 milhões de beneficiários de saúde e odontologia espalhados pelas cinco regiões do Brasil. Todo o aparato ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:37,160
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Craneware Group

The Craneware Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

The Craneware Group has 28.06% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Craneware Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Craneware Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Craneware Group

The Craneware Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CRA1784535812
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between The Craneware Group company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Craneware Group company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Craneware Group company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Craneware Group company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Craneware Group company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Craneware Group company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Craneware Group company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Craneware Group company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Craneware Group company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Craneware Group company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Craneware Group company and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Craneware Group and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Craneware Group and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Craneware Group or Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Craneware Group or Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica ?
Between The Craneware Group and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Craneware Group and Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA