Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

crampasAI by Packet Systems IndonesiacrampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia
VS
TD SYNNEX North AmericaTD SYNNEX North America
crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia

crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia

Jakarta Selatan, 12560, ID

Last Update: 01/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://crampas.ai/
753/1000Fair

Empowering Industries with GenerativeAI technology to revolutionising daily operations in order to unlock unprecedented productivity, possibilities, and profitability. Our innovative solutions seamlessly integrate into your workflows, enabling you to achieve higher effi...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TD SYNNEX North America

TD SYNNEX North America

5350 Tech Data Dr,, Clearwater, 33760, US

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
780/1000Fair

We’re TD SYNNEX (NYSE: SNX), a leading distributor and solutions aggregator for the IT ecosystem. We’re 22,000 of the IT industry’s best and brightest, who share an unwavering passion for bringing compelling technology products, services and solutions to the world. We’...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:13,067
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia

crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TD SYNNEX North America

TD SYNNEX North America

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TD SYNNEX North America in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TD SYNNEX North America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TD SYNNEX North America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia

crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TD SYNNEX North America

TD SYNNEX North America

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia company and TD SYNNEX North America company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia company and TD SYNNEX North America company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia company and TD SYNNEX North America company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia company and TD SYNNEX North America company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia company and TD SYNNEX North America company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia company and TD SYNNEX North America company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia company and TD SYNNEX North America company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia company and TD SYNNEX North America company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia company and TD SYNNEX North America company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia company and TD SYNNEX North America company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia company and TD SYNNEX North America company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia and TD SYNNEX North America, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia and TD SYNNEX North America, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia or TD SYNNEX North America ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia or TD SYNNEX North America ?
Between crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia and TD SYNNEX North America, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between crampasAI by Packet Systems Indonesia and TD SYNNEX North America, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2