Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Crédit Mutuel FactoringCrédit Mutuel Factoring
VS
RBCRBC
Crédit Mutuel Factoring

Crédit Mutuel Factoring

Tour D2 17 bis place des Reflets, PARIS LA DEFENSE CEDEX, FR, 92988

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

Crédit Mutuel Factoring est spécialisé dans l’affacturage et la mobilisation de créances professionnelles (Dailly) pour répondre aux besoins de trésorerie récurrents ou ponctuels des entreprises. Ses offres sont assorties de services complémentaires, notamment en mati...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:301
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
RBC

RBC

200 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5J 2J5

Last Update: 12/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.rbc.com
814/1000Good

Royal Bank of Canada is a global financial institution with a purpose-driven, principles-led approach to delivering leading performance. Our success comes from the 94,000+ employees who leverage their imaginations and insights to bring our vision, values and strategy to...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:96,279
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Crédit Mutuel Factoring

Crédit Mutuel Factoring

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
RBC

RBC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crédit Mutuel Factoring in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RBC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Crédit Mutuel Factoring (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crédit Mutuel Factoring cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - RBC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RBC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Crédit Mutuel Factoring

Crédit Mutuel Factoring

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
RBC

RBC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RBC3032130100425

FAQ

Between Crédit Mutuel Factoring company and RBC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Crédit Mutuel Factoring company and RBC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Crédit Mutuel Factoring company and RBC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Crédit Mutuel Factoring company and RBC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Crédit Mutuel Factoring company and RBC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Crédit Mutuel Factoring company and RBC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Crédit Mutuel Factoring company and RBC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Crédit Mutuel Factoring company and RBC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Crédit Mutuel Factoring company and RBC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Crédit Mutuel Factoring company and RBC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Crédit Mutuel Factoring company and RBC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Crédit Mutuel Factoring and RBC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Crédit Mutuel Factoring and RBC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Crédit Mutuel Factoring or RBC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Crédit Mutuel Factoring or RBC ?
Between Crédit Mutuel Factoring and RBC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Crédit Mutuel Factoring and RBC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8