Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CPOTCPOT
VS
HolcimHolcim
CPOT

CPOT

Herrjärva torg 4, Solna, 170 67, SE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://cpot.se/
769/1000Fair

CPOT är en digital tjänst för säkrare vägar i vår omgivning. Genom att förenkla identifiering och lagning av vägskador bidar vi både till att minska skador på fordon och undvika olyckor CPOT förenklar vardagen för dig som jobbar med vägunderhåll. Det ska vara lika ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Holcim

Holcim

Grafenauweg 10, Zug, CH, 6300

Last Update: 19/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.holcim.com/
804/1000Good

Holcim is the leading partner for sustainable construction with net sales of CHF 15.7 billion in 2025, creating value across the built environment from infrastructure and industry to buildings. We have more than 45 000 employees in 43 attractive markets – across Europ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:41,823
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CPOT

CPOT

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Holcim

Holcim

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CPOT in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holcim in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CPOT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CPOT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Holcim (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holcim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CPOT

CPOT

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Holcim

Holcim

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CPOT company and Holcim company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CPOT company and Holcim company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CPOT company and Holcim company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CPOT company and Holcim company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CPOT company and Holcim company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CPOT company and Holcim company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CPOT company and Holcim company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CPOT company and Holcim company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CPOT company and Holcim company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CPOT company and Holcim company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CPOT company and Holcim company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CPOT and Holcim, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CPOT and Holcim, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CPOT or Holcim ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CPOT or Holcim ?
Between CPOT and Holcim, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CPOT and Holcim, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-47238
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #133, a normal authenticated user can edit another user's video subtitles because of a lack of authorization. They can upload subtitles, edit their name or delete them. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #133.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-45418
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #132, any authenticated user who can upload videos can add multiple subtitles from different files and change their title (English, Spanish...). The POST /actions/subtitle_edit.php request used to change their title includes a number parameter which is vulnerable to SQL Injection. A boolean-based blind SQL injection can be used to exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #132.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45060
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #129, the actions/progress_video.php endpoint is vulnerable to blind SQL injection. Any unauthenticated user can exploit the ids parameter to execute SQL queries and exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #129.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42846
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #140, ClipBucket's Remote Play feature allows any authenticated user to add a video by importing an external URL as the source. Some shell commands are run with the URL as a parameter. The URL is concatenated directly into shell commands without escaping then executed, so any shell metacharacter in the URL is interpreted. This results in arbitrary command execution. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #140.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-6250
SUMMARY

An authenticated format string vulnerability exists in the ONVIF service of Tapo C110 v2 due to improper handling of user-controlled input.  Externally controlled data is interpreted as a format string, which can be used to manipulate stack memory, including control flow data such as return addresses. A remote authenticated attacker may redirect execution flow to existing internal functions, triggering an unauthorized factory reset, leading to loss of configuration, deletion of stored credentials and service disruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA