Comparison Overview
CPC (OMG)

CPC (OMG)
777 Lai Chi Kok Road, Kowloon, HK
Last Update: 18/11/2025
CPC (Continuity Plus Company) is the global leader in short-term loyalty and redemption programmes for retail sector. We provide data-driven, digitally enhanced, tailor-made solutions which improve performance – on a transactional and emotional level - by changing consu...

Publicis Groupe
133, avenue des Champs-Elysées, Paris, 75008, FR
Last Update: 07/10/2026
Founded in 1926 by Marcel Bleustein-Blanchet, today Publicis Groupe is one of the largest communications groups in the world and a leader in marketing, communication, and digital business transformation, led by Arthur Sadoun, the third CEO in its history. Publicis Gro...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CPC (OMG)







Publicis Groupe






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CPC (OMG) in 2026.
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Publicis Groupe in 2026.
Incident History - CPC (OMG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CPC (OMG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Publicis Groupe (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Publicis Groupe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CPC (OMG)

Publicis Groupe
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.