Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

cPanelcPanel
VS
[24]7.ai[24]7.ai
cPanel

cPanel

1100 W 23rd St, Houston, 77008, US

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://cpanel.net
589/1000Very Poor

cPanel is the leading control panel for website and server management, trusted by hosting providers, system administrators, and web professionals worldwide. For more than two decades, cPanel has given customers a reliable way to configure, monitor, and secure hosting ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:182
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
10
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3
[24]7.ai

[24]7.ai

2105 S Bascom Ave, Campbell, 95008, US

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.247.ai/
778/1000Fair

[24]7.ai™ customer engagement solutions use conversational artificial intelligence to understand customer intent, enabling companies to create personalized, predictive, and effortless customer experiences across all channels; attract and retain customers; boost agent pr...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:11,282
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
cPanel

cPanel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
[24]7.ai

[24]7.ai

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

cPanel has 852.38% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for [24]7.ai in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - cPanel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

cPanel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - [24]7.ai (X = Date, Y = Severity)

[24]7.ai cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
cPanel

cPanel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CPA1790180943
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
PLEACRCPA1789547109
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CPA1788949718
[24]7.ai

[24]7.ai

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between cPanel company and [24]7.ai company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between cPanel company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between cPanel company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between cPanel company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between cPanel company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between cPanel company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between cPanel company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between cPanel company and [24]7.ai company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between cPanel company and [24]7.ai company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between cPanel company and [24]7.ai company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between cPanel company and [24]7.ai company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between cPanel and [24]7.ai, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between cPanel and [24]7.ai, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - cPanel or [24]7.ai ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - cPanel or [24]7.ai ?
Between cPanel and [24]7.ai, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between cPanel and [24]7.ai, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES