Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam)Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam)
VS
National Park ServiceNational Park Service
Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam)

Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam)

N/A

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ameli.fr
760/1000Fair

Travailler à l'Assurance Maladie, c'est s'engager au sein d'un collectif animé par la culture du résultat, où chacun met ses compétences au service de nombreux projets pour protéger la santé de plus de 60 millions d'assurés. L'Assurance Maladie protège la vie privée des...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:177
Subsidiaries:110
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
National Park Service

National Park Service

1849 C Street N.W., Washington, D.C., US, 20240

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nps.gov
802/1000Good

Most people know that the National Park Service cares for national parks, a network of over 420 natural, cultural and recreational sites across the nation. The treasures in this system – the first of its kind in the world – have been set aside by the American people to ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:14,176
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam)

Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
National Park Service

National Park Service

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Park Service in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - National Park Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Park Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam)

Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
National Park Service

National Park Service

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) company and National Park Service company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) company and National Park Service company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) company and National Park Service company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) company and National Park Service company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) company and National Park Service company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) and National Park Service, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) and National Park Service, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) or National Park Service ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) or National Park Service ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) and National Park Service, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Morbihan (Cpam) and National Park Service, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1