Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie)CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie)
VS
I WORK FOR SAI WORK FOR SA
CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie)

CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie)

41, Rue du Touffenet, Poitiers Cedex 9, 86043, FR

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://assurance-maladie.fr
760/1000Fair

« Travailler à l'Assurance Maladie, c'est s'engager au sein d'un collectif animé par la culture du résultat, où chacun met ses compétences au service de nombreux projets pour protéger la santé de plus de 60 millions d'assurés. » « L'Assurance Maladie protège la vie priv...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:113
Subsidiaries:113
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
I WORK FOR SA

I WORK FOR SA

200, Victoria Square / Tarndanyangga, Adelaide, 5000, AU

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://iworkfor.sa.gov.au
779/1000Fair

The OFFICIAL careers page for the South Australian Government. The South Australian Public Sector is the State's largest workforce. We are an employer of choice that reflects the diverse community we serve. Our people are from a range of backgrounds and vocations, fro...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:19,039
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie)

CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
I WORK FOR SA

I WORK FOR SA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for I WORK FOR SA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - I WORK FOR SA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

I WORK FOR SA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie)

CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
I WORK FOR SA

I WORK FOR SA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) company and I WORK FOR SA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) and I WORK FOR SA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) and I WORK FOR SA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) or I WORK FOR SA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) or I WORK FOR SA ?
Between CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) and I WORK FOR SA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CPAM de la Vienne (Assurance Maladie) and I WORK FOR SA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9