Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM)Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM)
VS
U.S. Department of the TreasuryU.S. Department of the Treasury
Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM)

Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM)

N/A

Last Update: 02/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://assurance-maladie.fr
760/1000Fair

💡 Travailler à l’Assurance Maladie, c’est s’engager au sein d’un collectif animé par la culture du résultat, où chacun met ses compétences au service de nombreux projets pour protéger la santé de plus de 68 millions d’assurés. Depuis près de 80 ans, l'Assurance Malad...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:89
Subsidiaries:113
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
U.S. Department of the Treasury

U.S. Department of the Treasury

1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, 20005, US

Last Update: 14/07/2026

View Profile
500/1000Critical

The Treasury Department is the executive agency responsible for promoting economic prosperity and ensuring the financial security of the United States. The Department is responsible for a wide range of activities such as advising the President on economic and financial ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:14,483
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM)

Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
U.S. Department of the Treasury

U.S. Department of the Treasury

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

U.S. Department of the Treasury has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - U.S. Department of the Treasury (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Department of the Treasury cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM)

Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
U.S. Department of the Treasury

U.S. Department of the Treasury

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
US-CIS1784060682
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-526082425
🔒 Incident : Breach
US-000030825

FAQ

Between Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) company and U.S. Department of the Treasury company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) and U.S. Department of the Treasury, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) and U.S. Department of the Treasury, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) or U.S. Department of the Treasury ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) or U.S. Department of the Treasury ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) and U.S. Department of the Treasury, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Assurance Maladie du Tarn (CPAM) and U.S. Department of the Treasury, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8