Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie)CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie)
VS
FDAFDA
CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie)

CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie)

113, Rue de Paris, Mâcon Cedex 9, 71022, FR

Last Update: 17/04/2026

View Profile
760/1000Fair

Travailler à l’Assurance Maladie, c’est s’engager au sein d’un collectif où chacun met ses compétences au service de nombreux projets pour protéger la santé de plus de 60 millions d'assurés. En Saône-et-Loire, l'Assurance Maladie verse chaque année plus de 1,64 milliar...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:109
Subsidiaries:113
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
FDA

FDA

10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, 20993, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.fda.gov/
802/1000Good

The Food and Drug Administration is an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services. The FDA is responsible for protecting the public health by ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devi...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,753
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie)

CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
FDA

FDA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FDA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - FDA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FDA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie)

CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
FDA

FDA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and FDA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and FDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and FDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and FDA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and FDA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and FDA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and FDA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and FDA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and FDA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and FDA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) company and FDA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) and FDA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) and FDA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) or FDA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) or FDA ?
Between CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) and FDA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CPAM de Saône-et-Loire (Assurance Maladie) and FDA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA