Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Assurance Maladie de la MancheAssurance Maladie de la Manche
VS
FDAFDA
Assurance Maladie de la Manche

Assurance Maladie de la Manche

Montée du Bois André, Saint-Lô, 50000, FR

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://assurance-maladie.fr
759/1000Fair

Travailler à l'Assurance Maladie, c'est s'engager au sein d'un collectif animé par la culture du résultat, où chacun met ses compétences au service de nombreux projets pour protéger la santé de plus de 60 millions d'assurés. L'Assurance Maladie de la Manche souhaite ici...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:71
Subsidiaries:113
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
FDA

FDA

10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, 20993, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.fda.gov/
802/1000Good

The Food and Drug Administration is an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services. The FDA is responsible for protecting the public health by ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devi...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,340
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Assurance Maladie de la Manche

Assurance Maladie de la Manche

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
FDA

FDA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Assurance Maladie de la Manche in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FDA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Assurance Maladie de la Manche (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Assurance Maladie de la Manche cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - FDA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FDA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Assurance Maladie de la Manche

Assurance Maladie de la Manche

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
FDA

FDA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Assurance Maladie de la Manche company and FDA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Assurance Maladie de la Manche company and FDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Assurance Maladie de la Manche company and FDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Assurance Maladie de la Manche company and FDA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Assurance Maladie de la Manche company and FDA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Assurance Maladie de la Manche company and FDA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Assurance Maladie de la Manche company and FDA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Assurance Maladie de la Manche company and FDA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Assurance Maladie de la Manche company and FDA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Assurance Maladie de la Manche company and FDA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Assurance Maladie de la Manche company and FDA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Assurance Maladie de la Manche and FDA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Assurance Maladie de la Manche and FDA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Assurance Maladie de la Manche or FDA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Assurance Maladie de la Manche or FDA ?
Between Assurance Maladie de la Manche and FDA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Assurance Maladie de la Manche and FDA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8