Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CPAM de la Haute-VienneCPAM de la Haute-Vienne
VS
Texas Health and Human ServicesTexas Health and Human Services
CPAM de la Haute-Vienne

CPAM de la Haute-Vienne

22 rue Jean Gagnant , LIMOGES, undefined, 87034, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
759/1000Fair

La CPAM de la Haute-Vienne est un organisme de sécurité sociale qui assure plus de 302 000 bénéficiaires du régime général. Elle prend en charge les risques maladie, maternité, accidents du travail et maladies professionnelles. Elle met en œuvre au niveau local la pol...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:56
Subsidiaries:113
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Texas Health and Human Services

Texas Health and Human Services

4601 W Guadalupe St. , Austin, 78751, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://hhs.texas.gov
779/1000Fair

Texas Health and Human Services, also known as the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC), helps more than 7.5 million Texans every month. The agency supports the needs of mothers, children and families through programs such as Medicaid, CHIP, SNAP, women’s h...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:11,329
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CPAM de la Haute-Vienne

CPAM de la Haute-Vienne

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Texas Health and Human Services

Texas Health and Human Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CPAM de la Haute-Vienne in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Health and Human Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CPAM de la Haute-Vienne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CPAM de la Haute-Vienne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Texas Health and Human Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Health and Human Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CPAM de la Haute-Vienne

CPAM de la Haute-Vienne

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Texas Health and Human Services

Texas Health and Human Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CPAM de la Haute-Vienne company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CPAM de la Haute-Vienne company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CPAM de la Haute-Vienne company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CPAM de la Haute-Vienne company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CPAM de la Haute-Vienne company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CPAM de la Haute-Vienne company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CPAM de la Haute-Vienne company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CPAM de la Haute-Vienne company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CPAM de la Haute-Vienne company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CPAM de la Haute-Vienne company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CPAM de la Haute-Vienne company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CPAM de la Haute-Vienne and Texas Health and Human Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CPAM de la Haute-Vienne and Texas Health and Human Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CPAM de la Haute-Vienne or Texas Health and Human Services ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CPAM de la Haute-Vienne or Texas Health and Human Services ?
Between CPAM de la Haute-Vienne and Texas Health and Human Services, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CPAM de la Haute-Vienne and Texas Health and Human Services, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3