Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie)CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie)
VS
City of PhiladelphiaCity of Philadelphia
CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie)

CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie)

undefined, PARIS, undefined, undefined, FR

Last Update: 21/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ameli.fr/paris
763/1000Fair

Travailler à l’Assurance Maladie, c’est s’engager au sein d’un collectif animé par la culture du résultat, où chacun met ses compétences au service de nombreux projets pour protéger la santé de plus de 60 millions d’assurés. Répartie sur 19 sites sur le territoire pari...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:561
Subsidiaries:113
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
City of Philadelphia

City of Philadelphia

City Hall, Philadelphia, 19102, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.phila.gov
694/1000Weak

With a workforce of 30,000 people, and opportunities in 1,000 different job categories, the City of Philadelphia is one of the largest employers in Southeastern Pennsylvania. As an employer, we operate through the guiding principles of service, integrity, respect, accou...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:11,720
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie)

CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
City of Philadelphia

City of Philadelphia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Philadelphia in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - City of Philadelphia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Philadelphia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie)

CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
City of Philadelphia

City of Philadelphia

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CIT149121123
🔒 Incident : Breach
CIT632072525
🔒 Incident : Breach
CIT359072625

FAQ

Between CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) and City of Philadelphia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) and City of Philadelphia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) or City of Philadelphia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) or City of Philadelphia ?
Between CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) and City of Philadelphia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CPAM de Paris (Assurance Maladie) and City of Philadelphia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-26422
SUMMARY

clash-verge-service-ipc before 2.3.0 has a world-reachable IPC endpoint, leading to local privilege escalation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-11441
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. This vulnerability affects the function canAccessIssue of the file /issues/ of the component Pull Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument issue leads to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 is able to resolve this issue. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11440
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. This affects an unknown part of the file /repositories/{projectId}/default-branch of the component REST API. This manipulation of the argument project.defaultBranch causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 is able to mitigate this issue. Upgrading the affected component is advised.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11439
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /projects/ of the component Parent Project Handler. The manipulation of the argument project.parentId results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 can resolve this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11438
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /projects. The manipulation of the argument project.forkedFromId leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 addresses this issue. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8