Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie)CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie)
VS
Texas Health and Human ServicesTexas Health and Human Services
CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie)

CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie)

35, Rue Descartes, Calais, Hauts-de-France, FR, 62100

Last Update: 21/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.ameli.fr
760/1000Fair

Travailler à l’Assurance Maladie, c’est donner une nouvelle dimension à votre métier et agir au quotidien pour la protection de notre système de santé. Participez à une grande diversité de projets dans un cadre bienveillant et soyez fier de contribuer à une mission ess...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:165
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Texas Health and Human Services

Texas Health and Human Services

4601 W Guadalupe St. , Austin, 78751, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://hhs.texas.gov
779/1000Fair

Overview The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is an agency within the Texas Health and Human Services System. In September 2016, Texas began transforming how it delivers health and human services to qualified Texans, with a goal of making the Health and...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:10,817
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie)

CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Texas Health and Human Services

Texas Health and Human Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Health and Human Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Texas Health and Human Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Health and Human Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie)

CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Texas Health and Human Services

Texas Health and Human Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) and Texas Health and Human Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) and Texas Health and Human Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) or Texas Health and Human Services ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) or Texas Health and Human Services ?
Between CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) and Texas Health and Human Services, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CPAM de la Côte d'Opale (Assurance Maladie) and Texas Health and Human Services, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2