Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie)CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie)
VS
Social Security AdministrationSocial Security Administration
CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie)

CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie)

1 Avenue Sibian , Foix, 09015, FR

Last Update: 16/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ameli.fr
759/1000Fair

Travailler à l’Assurance Maladie, c’est s’engager au sein d’un collectif animé par la culture du résultat, où chacun met ses compétences au service de nombreux projets pour protéger la santé de plus de 60 millions d’assurés. La CPAM de l’Ariège est un organisme de sécu...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:44
Subsidiaries:113
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Social Security Administration

Social Security Administration

6401 Security Blvd, Baltimore, 21235, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
474/1000Critical

Social Security provides financial protection for our nation’s people, supporting more than 64 million individuals and families. With retirement, disability, and survivors benefits, Social Security is one of the most successful anti-poverty programs in our nation's his...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:46,616
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie)

CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Social Security Administration

Social Security Administration

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

Social Security Administration has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Social Security Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Social Security Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie)

CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Social Security Administration

Social Security Administration

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SSA1770710407
🔒 Incident : Breach
SSA5102551100825
🔒 Incident : Breach
SSA1773182549

FAQ

Between CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) company and Social Security Administration company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) company and Social Security Administration company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) and Social Security Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) and Social Security Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) or Social Security Administration ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) or Social Security Administration ?
Between CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) and Social Security Administration, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CPAM de l'Ariège (Assurance Maladie) and Social Security Administration, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3