Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CoW DAOCoW DAO
VS
Mercado LibreMercado Libre
CoW DAO

CoW DAO

Lisbon or Remote, Lisbon, PT

Last Update: 15/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://cow.fi
789/1000Fair

We are an ambitious, fast growing and international team working at the forefront of DeFi. We believe that we can make markets both more efficient and fair, by building the ultimate batch auction settlement layer across EVM compatible blockchains.

NAICS:51913
NAICS Definition:Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees:38
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Mercado Libre

Mercado Libre

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1430DNN, AR

Last Update: 17/07/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

At Mercado Libre, we are transforming the way people buy, sell, advertise, pay, finance, and ship across Latin America. We are the leading e-commerce and fintech company in the region, with a presence in 18 countries and a team of more than 120,000 people. We are one o...

NAICS:51913
NAICS Definition:Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees:63,301
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CoW DAO

CoW DAO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mercado Libre

Mercado Libre

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Internet Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

CoW DAO has 40.12% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Internet Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

Mercado Libre has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - CoW DAO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CoW DAO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mercado Libre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercado Libre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CoW DAO

CoW DAO

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
COW1776258259
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MAKCOW0X1769425866
Mercado Libre

Mercado Libre

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MER1783492030
🔒 Incident : Breach
MER04623322

FAQ

Between CoW DAO company and Mercado Libre company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CoW DAO company and Mercado Libre company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CoW DAO company and Mercado Libre company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CoW DAO company and Mercado Libre company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CoW DAO company and Mercado Libre company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CoW DAO company and Mercado Libre company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CoW DAO company and Mercado Libre company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CoW DAO company and Mercado Libre company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CoW DAO company and Mercado Libre company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CoW DAO company and Mercado Libre company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CoW DAO company and Mercado Libre company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CoW DAO and Mercado Libre, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CoW DAO and Mercado Libre, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CoW DAO or Mercado Libre ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CoW DAO or Mercado Libre ?
Between CoW DAO and Mercado Libre, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CoW DAO and Mercado Libre, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2