Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Covenant HealthCovenant Health
VS
Provincial Health Services AuthorityProvincial Health Services Authority
Covenant Health

Covenant Health

100 Fort Sanders West Blvd, Knoxville, TN, US, 37922

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
682/1000Weak

Covenant Health is a not-for-profit, locally owned integrated healthcare enterprise with a mission to improve the quality of life in our communities through better health. Covenant Health serves a 25-county region of Tennessee and has more than 2 million patient encount...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:4,902
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Provincial Health Services Authority

Provincial Health Services Authority

200-1333 West Broadway, Vancouver, V6H 4C1, CA

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.phsa.ca
781/1000Fair

Canada's first provincial health services authority. Provincial Health Services Authority (PHSA) is one of six health authorities – the other five health authorities serve geographic regions of BC. PHSA's primary role is to ensure that BC residents have access to a coo...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,531
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Covenant Health

Covenant Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Provincial Health Services Authority

Provincial Health Services Authority

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Covenant Health has 28.06% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Provincial Health Services Authority in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Covenant Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Covenant Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Provincial Health Services Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Provincial Health Services Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Covenant Health

Covenant Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
COV1767633656
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
COV416053125
Provincial Health Services Authority

Provincial Health Services Authority

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Covenant Health company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Covenant Health company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Covenant Health company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Covenant Health company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Covenant Health company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Covenant Health company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Covenant Health company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Covenant Health company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Covenant Health company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Covenant Health company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Covenant Health company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Covenant Health and Provincial Health Services Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Covenant Health and Provincial Health Services Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Covenant Health or Provincial Health Services Authority ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Covenant Health or Provincial Health Services Authority ?
Between Covenant Health and Provincial Health Services Authority, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Covenant Health and Provincial Health Services Authority, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1