Comparison Overview

Coty

VS

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

Coty

Buitenveldertselaan 3-5, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1082
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Since 1904, Coty has fearlessly pioneered innovation across the beauty industry. We have a reputation for breaking new ground; a history of ‘firsts’ and ‘bests’ that has laid the foundation for the industry as we know it today. For over a century, our brands have been empowering people to express themselves and create their own vision of beauty. It’s a legacy we’re proud to own and grow. We work hand-in-hand with our people, our partners and our customers. Together, we unleash every vision of beauty. We stand for the beauty of diversity and the diversity of beauty - celebrating and inspiring all the expressions of beauty that exist and that will exist. We honor you, and we honor our planet. We create Beauty That Lasts. A beauty that is both good to people and the world. Our mission is to create a forward thinking beauty; Products that provide new, innovative and simply better science based solutions. Let’s keep making over the beauty world TOGETHER.

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 11,158
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

767 5th Ave, New York, NY, US, 10153
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 700 and 749

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is one of the world’s leading manufacturers, marketers, and sellers of quality skin care, makeup, fragrance, and hair care products, and is a steward of outstanding luxury and prestige brands globally. The company’s products are sold in approximately 150 countries and territories under brand names including: Estée Lauder, Aramis, Clinique, Lab Series, Origins, M·A·C, La Mer, Bobbi Brown Cosmetics, Aveda, Jo Malone London, Bumble and bumble, Darphin Paris, TOM FORD, Smashbox, AERIN Beauty, Le Labo, Editions de Parfums Frédéric Malle, GLAMGLOW, KILIAN PARIS, Too Faced, Dr.Jart+, the DECIEM family of brands, including The Ordinary and NIOD, and BALMAIN Beauty. To explore our current job openings, go to www.elcompanies.com

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 50,183
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coty.jpeg
Coty
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-estee-lauder-companies-inc.jpeg
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Coty
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coty in 2025.

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Coty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coty.jpeg
Coty
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-estee-lauder-companies-inc.jpeg
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Coty company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Coty company.

In the current year, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company and Coty company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company nor Coty company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company and Coty company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company nor Coty company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Coty company nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Coty nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Coty company nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company employs more people globally than Coty company, reflecting its scale as a Personal Care Product Manufacturing.

Neither Coty nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Coty nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Coty nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Coty nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Coty nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Coty nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N