Comparison Overview

Coty

VS

Kenvue

Coty

Buitenveldertselaan 3-5, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1082
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Since 1904, Coty has fearlessly pioneered innovation across the beauty industry. We have a reputation for breaking new ground; a history of ‘firsts’ and ‘bests’ that has laid the foundation for the industry as we know it today. For over a century, our brands have been empowering people to express themselves and create their own vision of beauty. It’s a legacy we’re proud to own and grow. We work hand-in-hand with our people, our partners and our customers. Together, we unleash every vision of beauty. We stand for the beauty of diversity and the diversity of beauty - celebrating and inspiring all the expressions of beauty that exist and that will exist. We honor you, and we honor our planet. We create Beauty That Lasts. A beauty that is both good to people and the world. Our mission is to create a forward thinking beauty; Products that provide new, innovative and simply better science based solutions. Let’s keep making over the beauty world TOGETHER.

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 11,158
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Kenvue

None, None, Summit, New Jersey, US, 07901
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Kenvue is the world’s largest pure-play consumer health company by revenue. Built on more than a century of heritage and propelled forward by science, our iconic brands — including Aveeno®, BAND-AID® Brand Adhesive Bandages, Johnson’s®, Listerine®, Neutrogena®, Tylenol® and Zyrtec® — are recommended by health care professionals and can be trusted by consumers who use our products to improve their daily lives. Our team members share a digital-first mindset, with an approach to innovation grounded in deep human insights and work every day to earn a place for our products in consumers’ hearts and homes. At Kenvue, we believe everyday care can not only make people well; it can make them whole. Beware of recruitment scams: https://www.kenvue.com/media/recruitment-scams-alert

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 17,862
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coty.jpeg
Coty
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kenvue.jpeg
Kenvue
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Coty
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kenvue
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coty in 2025.

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kenvue in 2025.

Incident History — Coty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kenvue (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kenvue cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coty.jpeg
Coty
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kenvue.jpeg
Kenvue
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kenvue company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Coty company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Coty company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Kenvue company has not reported any.

In the current year, Kenvue company and Coty company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kenvue company nor Coty company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Coty company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Kenvue company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Kenvue company nor Coty company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Coty company nor Kenvue company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Coty nor Kenvue holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kenvue company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Coty company.

Kenvue company employs more people globally than Coty company, reflecting its scale as a Personal Care Product Manufacturing.

Neither Coty nor Kenvue holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Coty nor Kenvue holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Coty nor Kenvue holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Coty nor Kenvue holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Coty nor Kenvue holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Coty nor Kenvue holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N