Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Costello & Sons Insurance BrokersCostello & Sons Insurance Brokers
VS
Marsh RiskMarsh Risk
Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers

Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers

1752 Lincoln Avenue, San Rafael, CA, 94901, US

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
750/1000Fair

History: Costello & Sons Insurance (CSI) is a third generation brokerage originally opened in downtown San Francisco. We have grown to over 2,000 clients and over $45,000,000 in insurance premium, which puts us in the top 15% of insurance brokers in the nation...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:13
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Marsh Risk

Marsh Risk

1166 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, US, 10036

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.marsh.com
796/1000Fair

We help our clients and colleagues grow — and our communities thrive — by protecting and promoting possibility. We seek better ways to manage risk and define more effective paths to the right outcome. We go beyond risk to rewards for our clients, our company, our collea...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:26,578
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers

Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marsh Risk

Marsh Risk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh Risk in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marsh Risk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh Risk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers

Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Marsh Risk

Marsh Risk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers company and Marsh Risk company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers company and Marsh Risk company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers company and Marsh Risk company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers company and Marsh Risk company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers company and Marsh Risk company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers and Marsh Risk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers and Marsh Risk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers or Marsh Risk ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers or Marsh Risk ?
Between Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers and Marsh Risk, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Costello & Sons Insurance Brokers and Marsh Risk, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1