Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CORTAC GroupCORTAC Group
VS
Korn FerryKorn Ferry
CORTAC Group

CORTAC Group

1180 NW Maple Street, Issaquah, WA, 98027, US

Last Update: 31/10/2025

View Profile

As of January 1st, 2025, CORTAC Group was officially acquired by MIGSO-PCUBED, the world’s leading consultancy dedicated to project, program, portfolio, and change management. Visit MIGSO-PCUBED's LinkedIn page to continue following our journey.

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:48
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Korn Ferry

Korn Ferry

1900 Avenue of The Stars, Suite 2600, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90067

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kornferry.com
761/1000Fair

Korn Ferry is a global consulting firm that powers performance. We unlock the potential in your people and unleash transformation across your business—synchronizing strategy, operations, and talent to accelerate performance, fuel growth, and inspire a legacy of change. ...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:19,952
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CORTAC Group

CORTAC Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Korn Ferry

Korn Ferry

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CORTAC Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Korn Ferry in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CORTAC Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CORTAC Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Korn Ferry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Korn Ferry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CORTAC Group

CORTAC Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Korn Ferry

Korn Ferry

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KOR130072825

FAQ

Between CORTAC Group company and Korn Ferry company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CORTAC Group company and Korn Ferry company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CORTAC Group company and Korn Ferry company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CORTAC Group company and Korn Ferry company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CORTAC Group company and Korn Ferry company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CORTAC Group company and Korn Ferry company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CORTAC Group company and Korn Ferry company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CORTAC Group company and Korn Ferry company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CORTAC Group company and Korn Ferry company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CORTAC Group company and Korn Ferry company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CORTAC Group company and Korn Ferry company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CORTAC Group and Korn Ferry, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CORTAC Group and Korn Ferry, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CORTAC Group or Korn Ferry ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CORTAC Group or Korn Ferry ?
Between CORTAC Group and Korn Ferry, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CORTAC Group and Korn Ferry, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1