Comparison Overview
Corretora Brokers de Seguros

Corretora Brokers de Seguros
Rua Visconde de Pirajá 580 - Ipanema, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22410-002, BR
Last Update: 22/04/2026
A Brokers Seguros está entre as empresas líderes em consultoria de seguros no Brasil, com uma trajetória consolidada desde 1991. Nosso modelo personalizado de comercialização de seguros é reconhecido pela vanguarda e tradição, com foco em construir relacionamentos de lo...

TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited
15th floor , Tower A , Peninsula Business Park, Lower Parel, Mumbai , 400013, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
At TATA AIG General Insurance, we wear our achievements like a badge of honour – proudly and with gratitude! We have been recognized as one of India’s Top 100 Best Companies to Work For and among the Top 25 Best Workplaces in BFSI in 2024. As a joint venture between th...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Corretora Brokers de Seguros







TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Corretora Brokers de Seguros in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited in 2026.
Incident History - Corretora Brokers de Seguros (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Corretora Brokers de Seguros cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Corretora Brokers de Seguros

TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.
ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.
ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.
ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.