Comparison Overview
Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA)

Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA)
Josefstr. 218, Zurich, 8005, CH
Last Update: 03/04/2026
The S&P Global Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA) is an annual evaluation of companies’ sustainability practices. It covers over 12,000 companies from around the world. The CSA focuses on sustainability criteria that are both industry-specific and financially ma...

Gartner
56 Top Gallant Street, Stamford, 06904, US
Last Update: 19/06/2026
We deliver actionable, objective business and technology insights. Our expert guidance and tools enable faster, smarter decisions and stronger performance on an organization’s mission-critical priorities. Our unrivaled combination of business and technology insights st...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA)







Gartner






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA) in 2026.
Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Gartner has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Gartner (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gartner cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA)

Gartner
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.
A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service
PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.