Corning-pharmaceutical-technologies vs Eli-lilly-and-company - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

Comparison Overview

Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies

Eli Lilly and Company

Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies

N/A

Last Update: 30/01/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

https://www.corning.com/worldwide/en/products/pharmaceutical-technologies.html

754/1000Fair

Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies creates products that transport the medical discoveries of today and tomorrow. Glass is the ideal material for pharmaceutical applications, and Corning Pharmaceutical Glass is uniquely suited to supply high-quality pharmaceutical glas...

NAICS:3254

NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing

Employees:None

Subsidiaries:8

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Eli Lilly and Company

Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, US, 46285

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile

Between 800 and 849

http://www.lilly.com/

843/1000Good

We're a medicine company turning science into healing to make life better for people around the world. It all started nearly 150 years ago with a clear vision from founder Colonel Eli Lilly: "Take what you find here and make it better and better." Harnessing the power o...

NAICS:3254

NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing

Employees:53,748

Subsidiaries:19

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Eli Lilly and Company

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eli Lilly and Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Eli Lilly and Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eli Lilly and Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

Eli Lilly and Company

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies company and Eli Lilly and Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies and Eli Lilly and Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies and Eli Lilly and Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies or Eli Lilly and Company ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies or Eli Lilly and Company ?

Between Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies and Eli Lilly and Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Corning Pharmaceutical Technologies and Eli Lilly and Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451

SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

5.9

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/ultimate-member/vulnerability/wordpress-ultimate-member-plugin-2-13-1-privilege-escalation-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103342

SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

3.7

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/unlimited-elements-for-elementor/vulnerability/wordpress-unlimited-elements-for-elementor-free-widgets-addons-templates-plugin-2-0-20-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103065

SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

IMPACT SCORE

4.2

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/kirki/vulnerability/wordpress-kirki-plugin-6-3-1-arbitrary-code-execution-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-105122

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

CVSS4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

2.5

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-105121

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVSS4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.2

REFERENCES