Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cordant™Cordant™
VS
SLBSLB
Cordant™

Cordant™

N/A

Last Update: 04/03/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

Improve asset, process and sustainability performance with actionable insights. Businesses are under constant pressure to proactively optimize operations, while balancing performance, maintenance cost, and operational risk. To meet your challenges, we have integrated ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SLB

SLB

5599 San Felipe St, Houston, Texas, US, 77056

Last Update: 19/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.slb.com
827/1000Good

SLB is a global technology company that has driven energy innovation for more than a century. With a global footprint in more than 100 countries and employees representing almost twice as many nationalities, we work each day on innovating oil and gas, delivering digital...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:82,035
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cordant™

Cordant™

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SLB

SLB

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Energy Technology Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cordant™ in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Energy Technology Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SLB in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cordant™ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cordant™ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SLB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SLB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cordant™

Cordant™

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SLB

SLB

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cordant™ company and SLB company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cordant™ company and SLB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cordant™ company and SLB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cordant™ company and SLB company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cordant™ company and SLB company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cordant™ company and SLB company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cordant™ company and SLB company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cordant™ company and SLB company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cordant™ company and SLB company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cordant™ company and SLB company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cordant™ company and SLB company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cordant™ and SLB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cordant™ and SLB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cordant™ or SLB ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cordant™ or SLB ?
Between Cordant™ and SLB, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cordant™ and SLB, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2