Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Corcoran Sunshine Marketing GroupCorcoran Sunshine Marketing Group
VS
SavillsSavills
Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group

Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group

590 Madison Avenue , New York, NY, US, 10022

Last Update: 14/01/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

With more than 30 years of experience in marketing and collective sales of over $60 billion, Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group is the recognized industry leader in the researching, planning, design, marketing, and sale of luxury residential development both in the Unite...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:170
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Savills

Savills

33 Margaret Street, London, GB, W1G 0JD

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.savills.com
760/1000Fair

Savills is a global real estate advisor helping people thrive through places and spaces. With over 42,000 professionals in more than 700 offices across the Americas, Europe, Asia Pacific, Africa and the Middle East, we combine local knowledge with global insight to del...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:13,748
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group

Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Savills

Savills

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Savills in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Savills (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Savills cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group

Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Savills

Savills

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group company and Savills company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group company and Savills company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group company and Savills company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group company and Savills company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group company and Savills company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group company and Savills company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group company and Savills company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group company and Savills company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group company and Savills company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group company and Savills company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group company and Savills company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group and Savills, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group and Savills, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group or Savills ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group or Savills ?
Between Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group and Savills, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group and Savills, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1