Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Copart Deutschland GmbHCopart Deutschland GmbH
VS
Scania GroupScania Group
Copart Deutschland GmbH

Copart Deutschland GmbH

Am Seestern 24, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, DE, 40547

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.copart.de
746/1000Moderate

Copart Germany is a member of Copart Inc., which is a leader in online vehicle remarketing for 35 years and now trades more than 3 million vehicles a year worldwide via the virtual bidding technology VB3. The US company with headquarters in Dallas, Texas, employs more t...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:94
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Scania Group

Scania Group

Vagnmakarvägen 1, Södertälje, SE, SE-151 87

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.scania.com/
671/1000Weak

Scania is a world-leading provider of transport solutions committed to a better tomorrow. Our purpose is to drive the shift towards a sustainable transport system. In doing so, we are creating a world of mobility that’s better for business, society and our environment. ...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:38,365
Subsidiaries:65
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Copart Deutschland GmbH

Copart Deutschland GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Scania Group

Scania Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Copart Deutschland GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scania Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Copart Deutschland GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Copart Deutschland GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Scania Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scania Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Copart Deutschland GmbH

Copart Deutschland GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Scania Group

Scania Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NISSCATOYVOLKAWAVIJAG1775680268
🔒 Incident : Breach
SCA301061725

FAQ

Between Copart Deutschland GmbH company and Scania Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Copart Deutschland GmbH company and Scania Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Copart Deutschland GmbH company and Scania Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Copart Deutschland GmbH company and Scania Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Copart Deutschland GmbH company and Scania Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Copart Deutschland GmbH company and Scania Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Copart Deutschland GmbH company and Scania Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Copart Deutschland GmbH company and Scania Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Copart Deutschland GmbH company and Scania Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Copart Deutschland GmbH company and Scania Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Copart Deutschland GmbH company and Scania Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Copart Deutschland GmbH and Scania Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Copart Deutschland GmbH and Scania Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Copart Deutschland GmbH or Scania Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Copart Deutschland GmbH or Scania Group ?
Between Copart Deutschland GmbH and Scania Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Copart Deutschland GmbH and Scania Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3