Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cooper University Health CareCooper University Health Care
VS
Baylor Scott & White HealthBaylor Scott & White Health
Cooper University Health Care

Cooper University Health Care

One Cooper Plaza, Camden, 08103, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.cooperhealth.org
662/1000Weak

Cooper University Health Care is the leading academic health system in South Jersey and provides access to primary, specialty, tertiary, and urgent care, all within one complete health system. Cooper has nearly 14,000 team members including 1,600 nurses, more than 1,000...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:6,806
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
Baylor Scott & White Health

Baylor Scott & White Health

3500 Gaston Ave, Dallas, 75246, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://bswhealth.com
793/1000Fair

With us by your side, there's no stopping you. It's why we're creating a new kind of healthcare at Baylor Scott & White. And we're just getting started. As the largest not-for-profit health system in the state of Texas, Baylor Scott & White promotes the health and well...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:30,629
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cooper University Health Care

Cooper University Health Care

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Baylor Scott & White Health

Baylor Scott & White Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cooper University Health Care in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baylor Scott & White Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cooper University Health Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cooper University Health Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Baylor Scott & White Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baylor Scott & White Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cooper University Health Care

Cooper University Health Care

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
COO724072525
🔒 Incident : Breach
COO1431914112825
🔒 Incident : Breach
COO1391622
Baylor Scott & White Health

Baylor Scott & White Health

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cooper University Health Care company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cooper University Health Care company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cooper University Health Care company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cooper University Health Care company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cooper University Health Care company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cooper University Health Care company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cooper University Health Care company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cooper University Health Care company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cooper University Health Care company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cooper University Health Care company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cooper University Health Care company and Baylor Scott & White Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cooper University Health Care and Baylor Scott & White Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cooper University Health Care and Baylor Scott & White Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cooper University Health Care or Baylor Scott & White Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cooper University Health Care or Baylor Scott & White Health ?
Between Cooper University Health Care and Baylor Scott & White Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cooper University Health Care and Baylor Scott & White Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2