Comparison Overview
Cook Systems

Cook Systems
undefined, Nashville, Tennessee, undefined, US
Last Update: 22/03/2026
At Cook Systems, our 30-year legacy in the IT services industry and commitment to innovation drive our passion for developing exceptional IT talent. Serving numerous Fortune 500 clients from our Tennessee headquarters, our transformative approach sets us apart in the te...

Tech Mahindra
Erandwane, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411004
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Tech Mahindra offers technology consulting and digital solutions to global enterprises across industries, enabling transformative scale at unparalleled speed. With 149k+ professionals across 90+ countries helping 1100+ clients, TechM provides a full spectrum of services...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Cook Systems







Tech Mahindra






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cook Systems in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tech Mahindra in 2026.
Incident History - Cook Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cook Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tech Mahindra (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tech Mahindra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Cook Systems

Tech Mahindra
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.