Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Converge FOMConverge FOM
VS
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦
Converge FOM

Converge FOM

4 Technology Dr, Peabody, 01960, US

Last Update: 18/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.converge.com/fom
754/1000Fair

The FOM community is powered by individuals and organizations that care about managing obsolescence in their supply chains. The best way to tackle these challenges is through collaboration and sharing ideas. Let’s write the Future of Obsolescence Management together.

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

TW

Last Update: 26/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.quantatw.com
744/1000Moderate

Established in 1988, Quanta Computer is the largest notebook computer ODM company in the world. With leading technology and strong R&D capability, Quanta has become a leader in hi-tech markets and the best partner providing quality design and manufacturing services to t...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:11,080
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Converge FOM

Converge FOM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Converge FOM in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Converge FOM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Converge FOM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Converge FOM

Converge FOM

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
QUA15716222

FAQ

Between Converge FOM company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Converge FOM company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Converge FOM company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Converge FOM company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Converge FOM company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Converge FOM company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Converge FOM company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Converge FOM company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Converge FOM company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Converge FOM company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Converge FOM company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Converge FOM and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Converge FOM and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Converge FOM or Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Converge FOM or Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 ?
Between Converge FOM and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Converge FOM and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2