Comparison Overview

Control Engineering Europe

VS

Chicago Booth Review

Control Engineering Europe

Tonbridge, TN9 1BQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Control Engineering Europe (CEE) has, for over 30 years, been serving Europe's senior automation engineers with responsibility for the design, management and maintenance of their plant or factory. As manufacturing and process sites increase the digitisation of their operations and with Industry 4.0 becoming a reality, there is a noticeable shift in the pace of technology change. Even with the cloud of uncertainty hanging over global trade, automation solutions and predictive insights are still sought after. The goals of our audience, however, remain the same - to keep their plants and systems running efficiently and safely, minimise downtime and increase productivity. The introduction of ever more innovative solutions and immersive technologies look set to change the way that engineers work. With these innovations coming thick and fast, our role therefore at CEE, to inform and educate our senior engineers about these developments and offer insight with real-life situations, is even more important. Published 8x a year, CEE is available in print and online. We also serve the community with research and focused events both physical and digital. The purpose of our LinkedIn page is to enable our community to develop the themes and information we provide and to network.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chicago Booth Review

5807 S. Woodlawn Ave., Chicago, IL, US, 60637
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Chicago Booth Review publishes research-driven insights on business, policy, and markets. We are a publication of the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. The magazine traces its origins back to the 1960s, when Chicago Booth—or the Graduate School of Business, as it was then known—began publishing Selected Papers, written by faculty members for a general audience. In 1997, the school launched Capital Ideas as a separate newsletter that featured articles about faculty research. It subsequently evolved into a magazine of the same name. In 2016, we rebranded as Chicago Booth Review. Chicago Booth’s insistence on robust data, careful analysis, and rigorous models has characterized the Chicago Approach, and it’s our guiding value. Chicago has a long and proud tradition of debate and discussion. We welcome your comments and contributions. Listen: www.chicagobooth.edu/review/podcast

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/controlengeurope.jpeg
Control Engineering Europe
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-booth-review.jpeg
Chicago Booth Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Control Engineering Europe
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chicago Booth Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Control Engineering Europe in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Booth Review in 2025.

Incident History — Control Engineering Europe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Control Engineering Europe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chicago Booth Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Booth Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/controlengeurope.jpeg
Control Engineering Europe
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-booth-review.jpeg
Chicago Booth Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Control Engineering Europe company and Chicago Booth Review company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Chicago Booth Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Control Engineering Europe company.

In the current year, Chicago Booth Review company and Control Engineering Europe company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chicago Booth Review company nor Control Engineering Europe company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chicago Booth Review company nor Control Engineering Europe company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chicago Booth Review company nor Control Engineering Europe company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Control Engineering Europe company nor Chicago Booth Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Control Engineering Europe nor Chicago Booth Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Control Engineering Europe company nor Chicago Booth Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Chicago Booth Review company employs more people globally than Control Engineering Europe company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Control Engineering Europe nor Chicago Booth Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Control Engineering Europe nor Chicago Booth Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Control Engineering Europe nor Chicago Booth Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Control Engineering Europe nor Chicago Booth Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Control Engineering Europe nor Chicago Booth Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Control Engineering Europe nor Chicago Booth Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.