Comparison Overview
Continental Engineering Corporation

Continental Engineering Corporation
No. 95, Sec 2, Dun Hua S. Rd. Taipei City, Taipei City 106, TW
Last Update: 27/10/2025
Continental Engineering Corporation (CEC) is Taiwan’s leading pioneer in Construction Engineering field. Based in Taiwan with a footprint stretching to Hong Kong, Macau, Malaysia and India, CEC has achieved a superior track record in major infrastructure works as well a...

VINCI Construction
5 Cours Ferdinand de Lesseps, Rueil-Malmaison, 92500, FR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Premier groupe français et acteur mondial de premier plan de la construction, VINCI Construction réunit plus de 830 entreprises et près de 69000 collaborateurs dans une centaine de pays. Ses expertises s’étendent à l’ensemble des métiers du bâtiment, du génie civil, et ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Continental Engineering Corporation







VINCI Construction






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Continental Engineering Corporation in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for VINCI Construction in 2026.
Incident History - Continental Engineering Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Continental Engineering Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - VINCI Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)
VINCI Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Continental Engineering Corporation

VINCI Construction
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.