Comparison Overview
Conti Group Building Consultants

Conti Group Building Consultants
7 Lilian St, Bulleen, 3105, AU
Last Update: 05/05/2026
Conti Group Building Consultants are in the business of solving problems you didn’t know you had, where expertise meets innovation, and collaboration leads to success and in a way that transcends expectations and sets new standards in the industry. We are industry lead...

Kiewit
1550 Mike Fahey St., Omaha, 68102, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
At Kiewit, the projects we deliver make a difference, and we offer opportunities for you to make one, too. Our construction and engineering professionals work on some of the industry’s most complex, challenging and rewarding projects – whether it’s boring tunnels throug...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Conti Group Building Consultants







Kiewit






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Conti Group Building Consultants in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Kiewit in 2026.
Incident History - Conti Group Building Consultants (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Conti Group Building Consultants cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Kiewit (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Kiewit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Conti Group Building Consultants

Kiewit
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.