Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CATLCATL
VS
Electrolux GroupElectrolux Group
CATL

CATL

No.2 Xingang Road, Zhangwan Town, Jiaocheng District, Ningde City, Fujian Province, PRC 352100 , Ningde, Fujian 352100, CN, NING DE, CN

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.catl.com
840/1000Good

CATL is a global leader in innovative zero-carbon technology, providing comprehensive energy solutions to accelerate the global transition toward a sustainable future. Headquartered in Ningde, China, CATL has established 24 manufacturing bases and subsidiaries in Munic...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:5,838
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Electrolux Group

Electrolux Group

Electrolux - Stockholm, Stockholm, SE, SE-10545

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
805/1000Good

Electrolux Group is a leading global appliance company that has shaped living for the better for more than 100 years. We reinvent taste, care and wellbeing experiences for millions of people, always striving to be at the forefront of sustainability in society through ou...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:30,968
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CATL

CATL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Electrolux Group

Electrolux Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CATL in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Electrolux Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CATL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CATL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Electrolux Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Electrolux Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CATL

CATL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Electrolux Group

Electrolux Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CATL company and Electrolux Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CATL company and Electrolux Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CATL company and Electrolux Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CATL company and Electrolux Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CATL company and Electrolux Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CATL company and Electrolux Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CATL company and Electrolux Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CATL company and Electrolux Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CATL company and Electrolux Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CATL company and Electrolux Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CATL company and Electrolux Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CATL and Electrolux Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CATL and Electrolux Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CATL or Electrolux Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CATL or Electrolux Group ?
Between CATL and Electrolux Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CATL and Electrolux Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2