Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Contact Group (TAS)Contact Group (TAS)
VS
TE ConnectivityTE Connectivity
Contact Group (TAS)

Contact Group (TAS)

17 Federal St, North Hobart, 7000, AU

Last Update: 31/07/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://contactgroup.com.au/
692/1000Weak

Contact Group is proud to be a solely Tasmanian owned business employing Tasmanian's and stimulating the Tasmanian economy. Contact Group has evolved from the growth of our Contact Electrical businesses. The electrical industry is currently in a fast-paced innovative s...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:58
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
TE Connectivity

TE Connectivity

Galway, IE

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.te.com
810/1000Good

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) is a global industrial technology leader creating a safer, sustainable, productive and connected future. As a trusted innovation partner, our broad range of connectivity and sensor solutions enable the distribution of power, signal and da...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:40,483
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Contact Group (TAS)

Contact Group (TAS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TE Connectivity

TE Connectivity

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Contact Group (TAS) has 50.74% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TE Connectivity in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Contact Group (TAS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Contact Group (TAS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TE Connectivity (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TE Connectivity cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Contact Group (TAS)

Contact Group (TAS)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CON1785464632
TE Connectivity

TE Connectivity

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Contact Group (TAS) company and TE Connectivity company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Contact Group (TAS) company and TE Connectivity company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Contact Group (TAS) company and TE Connectivity company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Contact Group (TAS) company and TE Connectivity company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Contact Group (TAS) company and TE Connectivity company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Contact Group (TAS) company and TE Connectivity company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Contact Group (TAS) company and TE Connectivity company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Contact Group (TAS) company and TE Connectivity company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Contact Group (TAS) company and TE Connectivity company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Contact Group (TAS) company and TE Connectivity company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Contact Group (TAS) company and TE Connectivity company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Contact Group (TAS) and TE Connectivity, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Contact Group (TAS) and TE Connectivity, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Contact Group (TAS) or TE Connectivity ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Contact Group (TAS) or TE Connectivity ?
Between Contact Group (TAS) and TE Connectivity, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Contact Group (TAS) and TE Connectivity, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES