Comparison Overview
Constellation Culinary Group

Constellation Culinary Group
667 N Broad St, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, undefined, US
Last Update: 12/04/2026
Constellations are made of connections. So are we. In 2008, we began our pursuit to make people happy through food with one well-known restaurateur. But it takes much more than one person for us to accomplish lofty goals—it takes a team. Our dedicated people form stron...

PepsiCo
700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, 10577, US
Last Update: 14/06/2026
PepsiCo is a playground for curious people. We invite thinkers, doers, and changemakers to champion innovation, take calculated risks, and challenge the status quo. From executives to team members on the front lines, we’re excited about the future. We take chances. Toge...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Constellation Culinary Group







PepsiCo






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Constellation Culinary Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)
PepsiCo has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Constellation Culinary Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Constellation Culinary Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PepsiCo (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PepsiCo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Constellation Culinary Group

PepsiCo
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.