Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ClearsightClearsight
VS
E.ONE.ON
Clearsight

Clearsight

N/A

Last Update: 03/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.zeitview.com
752/1000Fair

Clearsight

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:38
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
E.ON

E.ON

Brüsseler Platz 1, Essen, 45131, DE

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.eon.com/en/imprint.html
815/1000Good

We are one of Europe's largest energy companies with the business areas of energy networks, energy infrastructure solutions and energy sales. It’s on us to make new energy work, and we are actively leading energy’s future – putting our customers first and delivering inn...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:30,515
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Clearsight

Clearsight

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
E.ON

E.ON

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clearsight in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for E.ON in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Clearsight (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clearsight cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - E.ON (X = Date, Y = Severity)

E.ON cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Clearsight

Clearsight

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
E.ON

E.ON

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Clearsight company and E.ON company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Clearsight company and E.ON company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Clearsight company and E.ON company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Clearsight company and E.ON company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Clearsight company and E.ON company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Clearsight company and E.ON company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Clearsight company and E.ON company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Clearsight company and E.ON company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Clearsight company and E.ON company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Clearsight company and E.ON company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Clearsight company and E.ON company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Clearsight and E.ON, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Clearsight and E.ON, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Clearsight or E.ON ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Clearsight or E.ON ?
Between Clearsight and E.ON, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Clearsight and E.ON, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES