Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD.CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD.
VS
EcopetrolEcopetrol
CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD.

CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD.

Intl Business Park, Singapore, undefined, 609922, SG

Last Update: 19/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ccel.ae
743/1000Moderate

Consolidated Contractors Engineering Limited (CCEL) is a company formed by Consolidated Contractors Company (CCC) in early 2013 with the intention of targeting medium sized Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) projects. Utilizing the capability and experience...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:37
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ecopetrol

Ecopetrol

Cra. 13 No. 36-24, Bogotá, CO, ----

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.ecopetrol.com.co
654/1000Weak

Ecopetrol (NYSE: EC) es la compañía más grande en Colombia y uno de los principales grupos de energía de Latinoamérica. Cuenta con más de 18.000 empleados y es responsable del 60% de la producción de hidrocarburos en Colombia. Es propietaria de las dos refinerías del Co...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:13,056
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD.

CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ecopetrol

Ecopetrol

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

Ecopetrol has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ecopetrol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ecopetrol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD.

CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ecopetrol

Ecopetrol

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ECO1784557630
🔒 Incident : Breach
ECO1784348677

FAQ

Between CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. company and Ecopetrol company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. company and Ecopetrol company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. company and Ecopetrol company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. company and Ecopetrol company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. company and Ecopetrol company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. company and Ecopetrol company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. and Ecopetrol, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. and Ecopetrol, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. or Ecopetrol ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. or Ecopetrol ?
Between CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. and Ecopetrol, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CONSOLIDATED CONTRACTORS ENGINEERING PTE. LTD. and Ecopetrol, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8