Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Consolidated BrickConsolidated Brick
VS
CarrierCarrier
Consolidated Brick

Consolidated Brick

650 Bodwell Street Extension, Avon, MA, 02322, US

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
707/1000Moderate

Owned and led by the Carey family since 1968, Consolidated Brick is a distributor headquartered in Avon, Massachusetts. Consolidated Brick's salesforce covers all of New England, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware. Our sales force promotes our masonry build...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:45
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Carrier

Carrier

13995 Pasteur Blvd, Palm Beach Gardens, 33418, US

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.carrier.com
787/1000Fair

Carrier is a global leader in intelligent climate and energy solutions, pioneering sustainable innovations in climate technologies. Founded by Willis Carrier, the inventor of modern air conditioning, we have been shaping industries and enhancing lives for more than a ce...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:25,922
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Consolidated Brick

Consolidated Brick

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Carrier

Carrier

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Consolidated Brick in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

Carrier has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Consolidated Brick (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Consolidated Brick cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Carrier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carrier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Consolidated Brick

Consolidated Brick

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CON037072825
Carrier

Carrier

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LIEVERTRACARTRIDEL1786611575

FAQ

Between Consolidated Brick company and Carrier company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Consolidated Brick company and Carrier company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Consolidated Brick company and Carrier company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Consolidated Brick company and Carrier company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Consolidated Brick company and Carrier company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Consolidated Brick company and Carrier company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Consolidated Brick company and Carrier company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Consolidated Brick company and Carrier company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Consolidated Brick company and Carrier company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Consolidated Brick company and Carrier company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Consolidated Brick company and Carrier company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Consolidated Brick and Carrier, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Consolidated Brick and Carrier, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Consolidated Brick or Carrier ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Consolidated Brick or Carrier ?
Between Consolidated Brick and Carrier, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Consolidated Brick and Carrier, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8