Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Consolidated Billing ServicesConsolidated Billing Services
VS
Signature Performance, Inc.Signature Performance, Inc.
Consolidated Billing Services

Consolidated Billing Services

N/A

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cbsbill.com
790/1000Fair

The primary goal of Consolidated Billing Services (CBS) is to enable healthcare providers more time focused on patient care by removing the complexities of revenue cycle management. CBS takes a differentiated approach. Our one-stop model helps streamline cost efficien...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Signature Performance, Inc.

Signature Performance, Inc.

10250 Regency Circle, Suite 500, Omaha, NE, US, 68114

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
724/1000Moderate

Signature Performance is dedicated to optimizing the business of healthcare. We specialize in healthcare revenue cycle management and data-driven solutions that help our clients operate more efficiently, recover revenue, and adapt to the ever-evolving healthcare landsca...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:702
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Consolidated Billing Services

Consolidated Billing Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Signature Performance, Inc.

Signature Performance, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Consolidated Billing Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Signature Performance, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Consolidated Billing Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Consolidated Billing Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Signature Performance, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Signature Performance, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Consolidated Billing Services

Consolidated Billing Services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CON041090625
Signature Performance, Inc.

Signature Performance, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SIG433072525

FAQ

Between Consolidated Billing Services company and Signature Performance, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Consolidated Billing Services company and Signature Performance, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Consolidated Billing Services company and Signature Performance, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Consolidated Billing Services company and Signature Performance, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Consolidated Billing Services company and Signature Performance, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Consolidated Billing Services company and Signature Performance, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Consolidated Billing Services company and Signature Performance, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Consolidated Billing Services company and Signature Performance, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Consolidated Billing Services company and Signature Performance, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Consolidated Billing Services company and Signature Performance, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Consolidated Billing Services company and Signature Performance, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Consolidated Billing Services and Signature Performance, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Consolidated Billing Services and Signature Performance, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Consolidated Billing Services or Signature Performance, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Consolidated Billing Services or Signature Performance, Inc. ?
Between Consolidated Billing Services and Signature Performance, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Consolidated Billing Services and Signature Performance, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-26422
SUMMARY

clash-verge-service-ipc before 2.3.0 has a world-reachable IPC endpoint, leading to local privilege escalation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-11441
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. This vulnerability affects the function canAccessIssue of the file /issues/ of the component Pull Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument issue leads to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 is able to resolve this issue. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11440
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. This affects an unknown part of the file /repositories/{projectId}/default-branch of the component REST API. This manipulation of the argument project.defaultBranch causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 is able to mitigate this issue. Upgrading the affected component is advised.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11439
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /projects/ of the component Parent Project Handler. The manipulation of the argument project.parentId results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 can resolve this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11438
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /projects. The manipulation of the argument project.forkedFromId leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 addresses this issue. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8