Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N InsuranceHUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance
VS
Allianz PartnersAllianz Partners
HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance

HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance

600 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, Florida, 33755, US

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.CCFNinsurance.com
750/1000Fair

TRUSTED ADVISOR IN YOUR COMMUNITY As one of the world's largest insurance brokers, HUB International leverages the buying power of a large organization to bring you more options, competitive pricing and customized solutions. In your community, our local offices deli...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:14
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Allianz Partners

Allianz Partners

Eurosquare 2, Saint-Ouen, 93400, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

Allianz Partners is a world leader in B2B2C insurance and assistance, offering global solutions that span international health and life, travel insurance, automotive and assistance. Customer driven, our innovative experts are redefining insurance services by delivering ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:12,294
Subsidiaries:107
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance

HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Allianz Partners

Allianz Partners

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz Partners in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Allianz Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance

HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Allianz Partners

Allianz Partners

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance company and Allianz Partners company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance company and Allianz Partners company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance company and Allianz Partners company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance company and Allianz Partners company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance company and Allianz Partners company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance and Allianz Partners, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance and Allianz Partners, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance or Allianz Partners ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance or Allianz Partners ?
Between HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance and Allianz Partners, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HUB International Florida, formerly CCF&N Insurance and Allianz Partners, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1