Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Condé Nast GermanyCondé Nast Germany
VS
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaABertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA
Condé Nast Germany

Condé Nast Germany

Oskar-von-Miller-Ring 20, München, Deutschland, 80333, DE

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.condenast.de
758/1000Fair

Unsere globalen Marken sind stilprägend und in ihren Segmenten der Inbegriff für Exzellenz. 1909 von Condé Montrose Nast in den USA gegründet, ist Condé Nast heute die Heimat zahlreicher einflussreicher Medienmarken wie VOGUE, Vanity Fair, GLAMOUR, GQ, The New Yorker un...

NAICS:51211
NAICS Definition:Motion Picture and Video Production
Employees:166
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Carl-Bertelsmann-Straße 270, Gütersloh, 33311, DE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
779/1000Fair

Bertelsmann ist ein Medien-, Dienstleistungs- und Bildungsunternehmen mit rund 75.000 Mitarbeitenden, das in gut 50 Ländern der Welt aktiv ist. Zum Konzernverbund gehören das Entertainment-Unternehmen RTL Group, die Buchverlagsgruppe Penguin Random House, das Musikunter...

NAICS:51211
NAICS Definition:Motion Picture and Video Production
Employees:20,317
Subsidiaries:39
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Condé Nast Germany

Condé Nast Germany

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Media Production Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Condé Nast Germany in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Media Production Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Condé Nast Germany (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Condé Nast Germany cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Condé Nast Germany

Condé Nast Germany

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Condé Nast Germany company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Condé Nast Germany company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Condé Nast Germany company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Condé Nast Germany company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Condé Nast Germany company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Condé Nast Germany company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Condé Nast Germany company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Condé Nast Germany company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Condé Nast Germany company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Condé Nast Germany company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Condé Nast Germany company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Condé Nast Germany and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Condé Nast Germany and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Condé Nast Germany or Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Condé Nast Germany or Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA ?
Between Condé Nast Germany and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Condé Nast Germany and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8