Comparison Overview
Concord Engineering Group, Inc.

Concord Engineering Group, Inc.
520 S. Burnt Mill Rd., Voorhees, 08043, US
Last Update: 12/02/2026
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. is a full-service engineering, energy consulting, construction management and commissioning firm. Concord was established in 1989 by Michael Fischette and other investors. Headquartered in Voorhees, NJ with other offices in Philadelphia, ...

Ramboll
Hannemanns Allé 53, Copenhagen, DK-2300, DK
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Ramboll is a global architecture, engineering and consultancy company founded in Denmark in 1945. Our 18,000+ experts create sustainable solutions across Buildings, Transport, Energy, Environment & Health, Water, Management Consulting and Architecture & Landscape. A...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Concord Engineering Group, Inc.







Ramboll






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Concord Engineering Group, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ramboll in 2026.
Incident History - Concord Engineering Group, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ramboll (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ramboll cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Concord Engineering Group, Inc.

Ramboll
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.