Comparison Overview

Conad

VS

Coles Group

Conad

Bologna, 40100, IT
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

PERSONE OLTRE LE COSE. Conad è una storia fatta di imprenditori, commercianti, clienti e comunità. Un lungo viaggio che inizia nella metà degli anni ’60: nel 1962 nasce a Bologna il Consorzio Nazionale Dettaglianti, una società cooperativa a responsabilità limitata costituita da 14 gruppi d’acquisto e 420 soci dettaglianti. Conad rappresenta un’azienda che ha sempre promosso l’associazionismo, modello che ancora oggi è il tratto distintivo nel panorama della grande distribuzione. Il nostro successo è anche quello raggiunto grazie imprenditori che hanno scelto liberamente di mettersi assieme nella consapevolezza del ruolo centrale della persona, delle sue ambizioni e dell’importanza di valorizzarne le potenzialità. La nostra offerta nasce dal nostro costante ascolto della comunità con la quale, attraverso la nostra prossimità al territorio, dialoghiamo ogni giorno per conoscerne le esigenze e i bisogni. 6 cooperative, 2.300 soci e i 3.174 punti vendita: questa è Conad oggi. Un’azienda che da sempre mette in primo piano le persone, oltre le cose.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 12,798
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Coles Group

800-838 Toorak Rd, Melbourne, 3123, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Coles is one of Australia’s leading retailers, with an extensive footprint of over 1,800 retail outlets nationally. We employ more than 115,000 team members, engage with more than 8,000 suppliers, and we welcome millions of customers through our store network and digital platforms every week. We are one of Australia’s largest employers and our workforce includes in store, corporate, manufacturing, distribution, and fulfilment. Our team members reflect the diverse communities in which we operate and we strive to make Coles a great place to work. • Our vision is to become the most trusted retailer in Australia and grow long-term shareholder value. • Our purpose is Helping Australians eat and live better every day. • Our priority is to provide leading food, drink, and home solutions that are delicious, sustainable, and healthy for our customers every day, both in-store and online.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 12,143
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conad.jpeg
Conad
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coles.jpeg
Coles Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Conad
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Coles Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conad in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coles Group in 2026.

Incident History — Conad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Coles Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coles Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conad.jpeg
Conad
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coles.jpeg
Coles Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Coles Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Conad company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Coles Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Conad company.

In the current year, Coles Group company and Conad company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Coles Group company nor Conad company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Coles Group company nor Conad company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Coles Group company nor Conad company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Conad company nor Coles Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Conad nor Coles Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Coles Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Conad company.

Conad company employs more people globally than Coles Group company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Conad nor Coles Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Conad nor Coles Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Conad nor Coles Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Conad nor Coles Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Conad nor Coles Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Conad nor Coles Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.