Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Con EdisonCon Edison
VS
CentricaCentrica
Con Edison

Con Edison

New York, New York, NY, 10003, US

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.coned.com
809/1000Good

We provide power to more than 10 million people and businesses across NYC and Westchester. Reliability and accessibility are central to what we do and how we provide energy service. Leading the industry to power tomorrow is our other focus- we are committed to aggressiv...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:9,206
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Centrica

Centrica

Maidenhead Road, Windsor, SL4 5GD, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.centrica.com
787/1000Fair

Centrica is an international energy services and solutions company, founded on a 200-year heritage of serving customers in homes and businesses. We supply energy and services to over 10 million customers, mainly in the UK and Ireland, through brands such as British Ga...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:18,421
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Con Edison

Con Edison

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Centrica

Centrica

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Con Edison in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centrica in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Con Edison (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Con Edison cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Centrica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centrica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Con Edison

Con Edison

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Centrica

Centrica

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Con Edison company and Centrica company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Con Edison company and Centrica company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Con Edison company and Centrica company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Con Edison company and Centrica company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Con Edison company and Centrica company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Con Edison company and Centrica company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Con Edison company and Centrica company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Con Edison company and Centrica company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Con Edison company and Centrica company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Con Edison company and Centrica company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Con Edison company and Centrica company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Con Edison and Centrica, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Con Edison and Centrica, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Con Edison or Centrica ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Con Edison or Centrica ?
Between Con Edison and Centrica, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Con Edison and Centrica, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9