Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Comsysto Reply GmbHComsysto Reply GmbH
VS
SwisscomSwisscom
Comsysto Reply GmbH

Comsysto Reply GmbH

Riesstraße 22, München, 80992, DE

Last Update: 20/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.comsystoreply.de
751/1000Fair

Comsysto Reply has pioneered and leads the lean and agile delivery of tailor-made solutions, designed to meet the challenges of digital transformation in enterprises. With a clear focus on agile organization, flexible open source frameworks and cloud services, Comsysto ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:122
Subsidiaries:140
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Swisscom

Swisscom

Alte Tiefenaustrasse 6, Worblaufen, 3048, CH

Last Update: 07/08/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.swisscom.ch/
756/1000Fair

As No. 1, we inspire people in the connected world. With the latest technologies and innovations, together we have the opportunity to shape the future. To do this, we are and act trustworthy, committed and curious. Are you with us? Join us on this exciting journey and ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:15,556
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Comsysto Reply GmbH

Comsysto Reply GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Swisscom

Swisscom

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Comsysto Reply GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Swisscom has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Comsysto Reply GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Comsysto Reply GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Swisscom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swisscom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Comsysto Reply GmbH

Comsysto Reply GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Swisscom

Swisscom

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SWI1786128838
🔒 Incident : Breach
SWI11477622

FAQ

Between Comsysto Reply GmbH company and Swisscom company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Comsysto Reply GmbH company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Comsysto Reply GmbH company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Comsysto Reply GmbH company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Comsysto Reply GmbH company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Comsysto Reply GmbH company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Comsysto Reply GmbH company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Comsysto Reply GmbH company and Swisscom company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Comsysto Reply GmbH company and Swisscom company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Comsysto Reply GmbH company and Swisscom company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Comsysto Reply GmbH company and Swisscom company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Comsysto Reply GmbH and Swisscom, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Comsysto Reply GmbH and Swisscom, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Comsysto Reply GmbH or Swisscom ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Comsysto Reply GmbH or Swisscom ?
Between Comsysto Reply GmbH and Swisscom, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Comsysto Reply GmbH and Swisscom, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9